Cantonese originally not Chinese???

Discussions on the Cantonese language.
Locked
gondri

Re: Cantonese originally not Chinese???

Post by gondri »

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

good bye in cantonese: "choi kin".

good bye in hakka: "choi kian".-

good bye in japanese: "sayonara".

So cantonese is not related to japanese at all and are real
chinese.


Many of your writing are false, anonymous sum won.
Hung Dao Dai Vuong

Re: Cantonese originally not Chinese???

Post by Hung Dao Dai Vuong »

i believe the Japanese language belongs to the same language family as Hungary!
Aurelio

Re: Cantonese originally not Chinese???

Post by Aurelio »

Dear all:

I personally would like to see this thread move so far down in the priority list that it doesn't appear on the first page anymore at all. I'm quite sure that the majority in this forum will share this opinion. The only way to make this happen is by not responding to this thread anymore.

So if right now you're considering to write flaming responses -JUST DON'T! It's not worth it anyway. Put this thread out of it's misery.

Regards,
Aurelio
Guest

Re: Cantonese originally not Chinese???

Post by Guest »

HKB wrote:coz we were probably dangerous. cantonese soldiers and combat regiments were always the most feared by China's enemies. Recall General Yuen Sung Wun or the 72 martyrs, etc. we R dangerous. :)
Language changes over time. Using that kind of meaning does not mean that we have different origins. Chinese has 2 origins, the North and the South. If you believe the Cantonese had been mixed with the North, the anthropologists would never find out. It's up to you believe it or not.
qrasy

Post by qrasy »

'Chinese has 2 origins', but it actually means that one Chinese are genetically different from each other (I guess: mainly because of different mixing). As I know, there were lots of mix in South Area, but Y gene never change, it can prove that South Chinese and North Chinese has the same grand-grand..father.
Cantonese guy

Post by Cantonese guy »

http://www.secretchina.com/news/article ... 4968b.html

民國初成,眾議員共商治國大計,民國國語幾被定為粵語,蓋因國會議員過半粵人也。然孫文先生顧全大局,力勸同鄉,國語終被定為京話


學者普遍認為客家話是古漢語的活化石,是在中原變亂時期(如:五胡亂華時)被北方遊牧民族驅趕到南方的漢族人說的語音。明代國語大概是和現在西安一帶說的官話相似。.....

普通話不是完美語言(事實上普通話是"人造語言",建國後在北京話基礎上修改而成,中國人自古以來就不是說普通話的,但現在許多人都誤解),所以才有趙元任殫精竭慮設計帶入聲國語的事情(民國)。.....

現在的北京話是女真滿洲人向漢族滿洲人學說漢語時用的口音。由於滿族後來成為統治者,所以離得近地區的權貴都放棄自己的當地口音說這種新的清朝官話,否則難免官途不順,生意難做,久而久之,也就變成在北方應用廣泛的普通話....


推廣普通話,其積極意義在於全國各族人民有一件交流工具。但不等於,南方話、南方文化比北方話、北方文化下賤
ongtk

Post by ongtk »

I think above story is completely wrong compare to he story told by Prof. 唐作藩of Beijing Univeristy.In 1924 ,there are are two sects of experts arguing about what kind of language is better for common language.Is it Nanjing hua which is National language even until 1850 or Beijing language with some changes in vocabulary and grammar?The outcome is in favour of latter instead of nanjing language with ru sheng and some consonants of southern languages.
There are no prove of Cantonese nearly being selected as National language after Chairman Mao toke over .Why not he selects his mother tongue-xiang hua as the National language?
It has been denied by several Prof.It is just a dream by some cantonese people.
Guest

Post by Guest »

qrasy wrote:'Chinese has 2 origins', but it actually means that one Chinese are genetically different from each other (I guess: mainly because of different mixing). As I know, there were lots of mix in South Area, but Y gene never change, it can prove that South Chinese and North Chinese has the same grand-grand..father.
based on your words of imagination. You wish one father as meaning as same root, which is beyond the work of science. It's ok to accept it as the Southern Chinese having a little mix but not all, 2000 years is generally 40 generations, not much. So there is no way that they could make up the whole Southern Chinese. Humans did not multiply that much as the mortality rate was quite high in the past. If Vietnam never gained independence, they would have been in Cantonese dialect as Annamese. The fate of Annamese did not have much difference from other Cantonese, except only political controls.
qrasy

Post by qrasy »

???
based on your words of imagination. You wish one father as meaning as same root, which is beyond the work of science. It's ok to accept it as the Southern Chinese having a little mix but not all, 2000 years is generally 40 generations, not much
No, I mean that its that Chinese does not come from annexation of 2 different people, South Chinese is not perfect non-original-Chinese.
If you mean that not all South-Chinese may be Han-descendant, there are so many persons in South China that don't claim they are Han.

If Vietnam never gained independence, they would have been in Cantonese dialect as Annamese. The fate of Annamese did not have much difference from other Cantonese, except only political controls.
What do you mean? Annamese is not the same as Cantonese. Their language are very different.
Cantonese guy

Post by Cantonese guy »

hi ongtk and everyone,

umm chairman Mao is the generation after the story i found.
I guess the link i gave is make sence (just make sence , doesn't mean truth because i don't know which one is truth, either). you could see most officers are cantonese. The link i found is talking about the 1st public gov (the current chinese gov in taiwan island)

In the Mao generation (the current chinese gov in mainland) , most officers speak nanjing language, beijing language... blah blah... etc

Therefore, it seems that what i found and what you heard are make sence and have no conflicts. The link i found is talking about the year of 1911 (not sure), and what you heard is about 1945
Locked