Page 2 of 7

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:19 am
by yangzi8007
:evil: I am a chinese college student .at first,
I want to tell you solemnly that chinese invent chinese language.
it is truth , just as korean originated from china,and it never alters,i think that korean will declare that all the world belongs to korean one day .and they think they are God,who create everything.funny?
it is a absurd theory of a radical folk .oh ,what can I say ?
maybe I could just say "let the ignorant people say what they want say
,because they never feel ashamed when tell a lie ,even if all the people laugh at them......
The rumor had its origin in an impulsive remark.
and the truth will lick up it with silence sooner or later ,if you believe what korean have said,you are more apish than korean .
at last ,i want to give a advise to korean "if you are human being,you should learn blush first.if you don't like to be man ,ok,come on ,saying
that loudly:"everything belongs to korean"..........
i am sorry for my poor english ,otherwise,i will say more about it.

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:13 am
by yangzi8007
korean, stop stealing traditional culture essentials from china!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

korea nation likes to steal Chinese invention

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:24 am
by hannu
everyone knowes that japanese and korean both derived from chinese, why waste your time with this crap?
everyone know the chinese has the longest continous culture in the world. chinese cultures have influences many cultures in southeast asia And east asia like japan and korean.

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:51 am
by onlyonechina
The Taoist teach so your this??

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:20 pm
by twtony
I had a conversion with a korean friend the other day (not about this topic)

He told me bubble tea was invented in Korea (-_-)

Afterward, I told him Chinese invented kimchi, that surely pissed him off....LOL

keep the truth

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 6:46 am
by Emperor Yao
"dominant people of the Yin dynasty was Korean "

the typical logical mistake,or the korean mean to mix the concept

Qizi ,the first noble of the Chaoxian(pre-korea) was a noble of Zhou dynasty, he was the bother of the last king of Shang dynasty.before this ,Zhou had been a noble of Shang,and the last king of Shang was a tyrant ,and all noble ran against him fellowing the tridional chinese philosophy ,the captical of the nobles who ran against the Shang was Zhou. Then the Zhou defeated the Shang.apparantly,the most kingship of Shang surrendered to Zhou,the last king of Shang burned himself in his palace when all nobles were on the step.The Qizi was the one who surrendered and was appointed to be the noble of territory of "East of Liao river" which was called "Chao xian".The Qizi Chaoxian differed from Korea .

Even in Han empire of China,Chaoxian was a part of China(not appendant),until the local resident arised,we call it "Korea"(Gaoli),they speaked as a nomad and had no characters,they were from the group of "Donghu" (easten hu),not "Dongyi"(easten yi),from the northeast
of China.

now,China has 56 folks ,the present Chaoxian(korea) was one of them, and the north and south Korea are just the part of Chaoxian, even South Korea is farther than north Korean in relationship ,culture ,history and so on.they are just the nation of the mediaeval minority and never related to the ancient China.

日,发明汉字的人不说汉语,不怕被人笑话

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:37 am
by steck
日,发明汉字的人不说汉语,不怕被人笑话

I am not sure about Chinese language, I know Koreans invente

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:21 am
by ks7602
stem cells. We all know what happened after that earth-shaking discovery. :wink:

123123123

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:51 pm
by Emperor Yao
“thinking it wasn't readable in modern Chinese perhaps. But the truth is, it is perfectly understandable. ”

i`m sorry but i have to say modern Chinese has been altered from ancient chinese . it is fool to take the modern chinese to improve the ancient chinese ,even i can say if the korean wrote the ancient chinese
literature ?though the someone says the modern korean language is close to the ancient chinese language,i`ll say the modern chinese is close to Latin .

we couldn`t improve that how to read Shang language, we just can make out that Shang words` characters was used to fortune following the book "Gui Zang Yi"(the transformation of GUI ZANG).and also the "Gui Zang Yi" has been lost ,if korea invented the Characters , they should have the book or the note of the book,where are they.

Ancient Chinese had the grammar ,but mostly from the customs.for example"geng shen yue you shi "(更深月有食),i guess it maybe 更申月有食。

更申or更深 is the adverbial modifier ,is to show the time
月 is moon
有 is verb ,means "have/has/had"
食 is the noun ,means "eclipse "

the meaning is moon had an eclipse at the time of "geng shen "

and modern chinese is"geng shen shi yue liang you ge yueshi",and the practical one may be "geng shen shi you yueshi ".omit the noun , the ancient one didn`t omit the noun because they sounded much good,Chinese care about this.

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 3:03 am
by gokure
Haha~~, the JOKE.